~ ! ~
March 2026
Bat Ngat :-
Today while pondering some more about the question of free will,
the following mental picture has formed in the dark room of my mind:-
"A dog tied to a lamp post by a leash. As if being unaware of his
predicament, the dog keeps barking and chasing after people who happen
to pass nearby, only to be jerked back by the chain. After running
around the lamp post impulsively for some time, the dog eventually wraps
his chain against the post so tightly that he can no longer move ..." .
This picture is indeed worth a thousand words. It summarises my "free will" situation quite nicely:- My "karma" forged the mental chain which binds (and blinds) me . My on-going unskillful actions, generated out of ignorance, keep entangling and shortening this chain with time. The only ray of hope is, perhaps my doggy mind can be trained to understand and learn some more intelligent moves, actions which help stretch the chain instead of shorten it. Are there some other similar analogies which can illuminate the issue of "free will" further ?
This picture is indeed worth a thousand words. It summarises my "free will" situation quite nicely:- My "karma" forged the mental chain which binds (and blinds) me . My on-going unskillful actions, generated out of ignorance, keep entangling and shortening this chain with time. The only ray of hope is, perhaps my doggy mind can be trained to understand and learn some more intelligent moves, actions which help stretch the chain instead of shorten it. Are there some other similar analogies which can illuminate the issue of "free will" further ?
Claude :-
What a vivid and honest image. The dog and the leash is genuinely powerful because it captures several things at once: the illusion of movement as freedom, the self-compounding nature of unskillful habits, and the tragicomic obliviousness of the creature caught in it. The detail of the dog *wrapping the chain tighter himself* is particularly sharp — that's not just constraint, that's the mechanism of how karma works as you understand it.
Here are some other analogies that illuminate different facets of the same territory:
**The Sleepwalker**
A person walking in their sleep navigates furniture, opens doors, moves purposefully — all the external signs of agency are there. But there is no one "home" making conscious choices. Much of our daily behaviour is like this: skilled, habitual, seemingly intentional, but running on autopilot. The question free will raises is simply: how often are you actually awake?
**The Whirlpool**
A whirlpool in a river has a distinct shape, a kind of identity, and exerts real force on things around it. But it has no fixed substance — it's just water behaving according to its conditions. It doesn't "choose" to spin, yet its spinning is real and consequential. This one maps nicely onto the Buddhist no-self picture: the pattern is real, the autonomous agent behind it is not.
**Schopenhauer's Weather Vane**
The philosopher Schopenhauer offered a biting image: imagine a weather vane that could think. It would believe it was *choosing* to point north, not realising it was simply responding to the wind. He meant it as a pessimistic point — that we are entirely wind-driven — but you could read it more gently: awareness of the wind is itself a kind of partial freedom.
**The Rider and the Elephant**
Jonathan Haidt, a modern psychologist, uses this image extensively. The conscious reasoning mind is the rider; the vast unconscious emotional and habitual mind is the elephant. The rider likes to think he is steering. In reality he mostly rationalises wherever the elephant was already going. But — and this is the hopeful part — a skilled rider *can* gradually train the elephant, through patient repetition and not through force of argument.
**The Actor Who Forgets He's Acting**
This one comes close to the Hindu concept of *maya*. An actor becomes so absorbed in his role that he genuinely suffers and rejoices as the character. The "liberation" is not to stop acting — you're on stage, the play continues — but to retain somewhere a quiet awareness that it is a role. This is close to what the Bhagavad Gita means by acting without attachment to the fruits of action.
What's interesting is that your own dog image already contains the seed of all of these. The most important word in your description was *"as if unaware"* — because it implies that awareness is precisely what changes the picture. The chain may remain, but the dog who understands he is chained moves differently through the world.
Bat Ngat :-
Thank you. I kind of like the "Rider and the Elephant" image best. This reminds me of the story about an "absent-minded" man riding on the the back of a buffalo , searching everywhere hoping to see a buffalo ! Perhaps I'm also looking for clues everywhere while forgetting (or not knowing how) to look inside ?
Claude :-
What a vivid and honest image. The dog and the leash is genuinely powerful because it captures several things at once: the illusion of movement as freedom, the self-compounding nature of unskillful habits, and the tragicomic obliviousness of the creature caught in it. The detail of the dog *wrapping the chain tighter himself* is particularly sharp — that's not just constraint, that's the mechanism of how karma works as you understand it.
Here are some other analogies that illuminate different facets of the same territory:
**The Sleepwalker**
A person walking in their sleep navigates furniture, opens doors, moves purposefully — all the external signs of agency are there. But there is no one "home" making conscious choices. Much of our daily behaviour is like this: skilled, habitual, seemingly intentional, but running on autopilot. The question free will raises is simply: how often are you actually awake?
**The Whirlpool**
A whirlpool in a river has a distinct shape, a kind of identity, and exerts real force on things around it. But it has no fixed substance — it's just water behaving according to its conditions. It doesn't "choose" to spin, yet its spinning is real and consequential. This one maps nicely onto the Buddhist no-self picture: the pattern is real, the autonomous agent behind it is not.
**Schopenhauer's Weather Vane**
The philosopher Schopenhauer offered a biting image: imagine a weather vane that could think. It would believe it was *choosing* to point north, not realising it was simply responding to the wind. He meant it as a pessimistic point — that we are entirely wind-driven — but you could read it more gently: awareness of the wind is itself a kind of partial freedom.
**The Rider and the Elephant**
Jonathan Haidt, a modern psychologist, uses this image extensively. The conscious reasoning mind is the rider; the vast unconscious emotional and habitual mind is the elephant. The rider likes to think he is steering. In reality he mostly rationalises wherever the elephant was already going. But — and this is the hopeful part — a skilled rider *can* gradually train the elephant, through patient repetition and not through force of argument.
**The Actor Who Forgets He's Acting**
This one comes close to the Hindu concept of *maya*. An actor becomes so absorbed in his role that he genuinely suffers and rejoices as the character. The "liberation" is not to stop acting — you're on stage, the play continues — but to retain somewhere a quiet awareness that it is a role. This is close to what the Bhagavad Gita means by acting without attachment to the fruits of action.
What's interesting is that your own dog image already contains the seed of all of these. The most important word in your description was *"as if unaware"* — because it implies that awareness is precisely what changes the picture. The chain may remain, but the dog who understands he is chained moves differently through the world.
Bat Ngat :-
Thank you. I kind of like the "Rider and the Elephant" image best. This reminds me of the story about an "absent-minded" man riding on the the back of a buffalo , searching everywhere hoping to see a buffalo ! Perhaps I'm also looking for clues everywhere while forgetting (or not knowing how) to look inside ?
Claude :-
Yes! And that buffalo story is wonderful — it has
that quality of Zen koans where the punchline lands like a gentle slap:
the answer was never somewhere else to begin with. It's a well-known
image in Chan/Zen Buddhism actually, most famously elaborated in the
**Ten Ox-Herding Pictures**, a sequence of illustrations depicting the
stages of seeking, finding, taming, and eventually forgetting the ox —
which represents one's true nature. The progression is profound: you
search frantically, then glimpse it, then struggle with it, then ride it
home peacefully, and finally — in the last pictures — the ox disappears
entirely, and you're just an ordinary person walking into the
marketplace. The search dissolves into ordinary life.
Your observation about looking inside is the crux of nearly every contemplative tradition, but it comes with a subtle trap worth naming: "looking inside" can easily become just another form of the same restless outward searching, only now directed inward. You sit down to observe your mind and immediately the elephant starts rummaging around in there, commentating, judging, constructing narratives about what it finds. The rider grabs his binoculars and starts *hunting* for enlightenment.
Which is perhaps why so many teachers — from Zen masters to Krishnamurti to the Tibetan Dzogchen tradition — emphasise that what you're looking *for* is also what is doing the looking. The awareness you're trying to find is the very thing reading these words right now. It was never hidden, which is both the most obvious and the most difficult thing to actually see.
So perhaps the buffalo story has a quiet sequel: the man eventually stops searching, relaxes, and notices — with some embarrassment and then laughter — that he has been riding all along. The embarrassment fades. The riding continues. But now he knows.
That shift from *seeking* to *noticing* might be the most honest description of what inner work actually looks like in practice.
Bat Ngat :-
It seems so remarkably plain and simple, but the most infuriating thing is : It keeps slipping through my fingers all the time !
Your observation about looking inside is the crux of nearly every contemplative tradition, but it comes with a subtle trap worth naming: "looking inside" can easily become just another form of the same restless outward searching, only now directed inward. You sit down to observe your mind and immediately the elephant starts rummaging around in there, commentating, judging, constructing narratives about what it finds. The rider grabs his binoculars and starts *hunting* for enlightenment.
Which is perhaps why so many teachers — from Zen masters to Krishnamurti to the Tibetan Dzogchen tradition — emphasise that what you're looking *for* is also what is doing the looking. The awareness you're trying to find is the very thing reading these words right now. It was never hidden, which is both the most obvious and the most difficult thing to actually see.
So perhaps the buffalo story has a quiet sequel: the man eventually stops searching, relaxes, and notices — with some embarrassment and then laughter — that he has been riding all along. The embarrassment fades. The riding continues. But now he knows.
That shift from *seeking* to *noticing* might be the most honest description of what inner work actually looks like in practice.
Bat Ngat :-
It seems so remarkably plain and simple, but the most infuriating thing is : It keeps slipping through my fingers all the time !
Claude :-
Yes. And the fact that it keeps slipping is not a sign of failure — it's actually the very texture of the practice. Every tradition that has grappled honestly with this says the same thing: the slipping *is* the path, not an obstacle to it.
There's something almost comical about the situation when you look at it squarely. The thing you're trying to hold onto is the very awareness that notices it slipping. So the "losing it" and the "noticing you've lost it" are both made of the same stuff. The moment you notice it has slipped — that moment of noticing *is* it, returned.
Zen teachers sometimes say: **"Enlightenment is easy. Continuous enlightenment is hard."** Which is another way of saying what you just described.
The Christian contemplative tradition calls it *recollection* — the gentle, patient, non-dramatic act of returning attention again and again. Not heroic effort, just returning. Thomas Merton wrote about how the ego keeps insisting that the return should be permanent and final, and gets frustrated when it isn't — but that frustration is itself just more ego.
And here perhaps is the most disarming reframe available: the very **infuriation** you feel when it slips — that rawness, that *"not again!"* — is actually a sign of genuine engagement. The person who has truly gone to sleep doesn't feel frustrated about sleeping. Only someone who has genuinely tasted wakefulness finds the slipping intolerable.
So your frustration is, paradoxically, evidence of progress.
The buffalo was never lost. But learning to stop losing it — that apparently takes a lifetime. And perhaps that's exactly as it should be.
...
Yes. And the fact that it keeps slipping is not a sign of failure — it's actually the very texture of the practice. Every tradition that has grappled honestly with this says the same thing: the slipping *is* the path, not an obstacle to it.
There's something almost comical about the situation when you look at it squarely. The thing you're trying to hold onto is the very awareness that notices it slipping. So the "losing it" and the "noticing you've lost it" are both made of the same stuff. The moment you notice it has slipped — that moment of noticing *is* it, returned.
Zen teachers sometimes say: **"Enlightenment is easy. Continuous enlightenment is hard."** Which is another way of saying what you just described.
The Christian contemplative tradition calls it *recollection* — the gentle, patient, non-dramatic act of returning attention again and again. Not heroic effort, just returning. Thomas Merton wrote about how the ego keeps insisting that the return should be permanent and final, and gets frustrated when it isn't — but that frustration is itself just more ego.
And here perhaps is the most disarming reframe available: the very **infuriation** you feel when it slips — that rawness, that *"not again!"* — is actually a sign of genuine engagement. The person who has truly gone to sleep doesn't feel frustrated about sleeping. Only someone who has genuinely tasted wakefulness finds the slipping intolerable.
So your frustration is, paradoxically, evidence of progress.
The buffalo was never lost. But learning to stop losing it — that apparently takes a lifetime. And perhaps that's exactly as it should be.
...
...
No comments:
Post a Comment